no lore · only receipts

The anabolic wiki that shows its work.

Most steroid information on the internet is the same book quoted back and forth since the 1990s. This site only publishes what can be checked: every statement carries a grade and a receipt — the PubMed paper or the bioassay record it comes from.

How statements are graded

DATA MODEL CLAIM
DATA  Published & linked
A peer-reviewed paper or a public bioassay record says exactly this. The receipt (PMID / assay ID) is linked inline, and the number on this page is the number in the source.
MODEL  Reasoning, assumptions shown
Not directly measured, but derived from linked data. The assumptions are written out so you can reject the conclusion if you reject an assumption.
CLAIM  Repeated everywhere, sourced nowhere
Standard gym/forum knowledge we could not find a source for. It stays on the page — visibly flagged — so you know which parts of the folklore are actually unverified.

Compounds — anabolics

Compounds — growth & bone

Compounds — ancillaries & support

Where the receipts come from

Literature: PubMed / Europe PMC. Receptor pharmacology: NCATS/NCGC qHTS confirmatory assays via ChEMBL / PubChem BioAssay. Every value lists the exact PMID or ChEMBL assay ID it was pulled from, with the pull date on the page.

Methods note: ChEMBL mirrors of qHTS sets include placeholder rows near each assay's maximum screened concentration (~44.7 µM) for inactive compounds — e.g. a “31.6 µM estradiol” row in an ERα agonist assay is biologically impossible and is treated as junk, not as data. Rows used on this site were sanity-checked against known reference ligands (e.g. diethylstilbestrol 1.0 nM in the same assay) before use.

What this site is not

Not medical advice, not a source to buy anything, and not written for anyone under 18. It is a harm-reduction reference for adults who are going to make their own decisions anyway: the least it can do is tell you which beliefs are load-bearing and which are folklore.